Solution to the problem of the Bhagavad-gita This would be the correct way to present the Bhagavad-gita. The original is called the primary source and there can be as many editions as you want but clearly differentiated from the original. Jayadvaita Swami has been dishonest because you can not edit a work and then present it as if it was the original published by the author. To add insult, they say that it is "better". It may be better or not, that is up to the reader to decide. What can not be done is to induce deception and confuse everyone by presenting their imposed opinion. It is NOT the same book and therefore it should be differentiated. Per it has been a way to feed your pride as a co-editor, but you can not be a less hidden and posthumous co-editor