Should you “improve” the Bhagavad gita with your own editorial judgment? Garuda proposes mixing editions of the Bhagavad-gita, adding notes suggesting “what the author really wanted to say,” and exchanging meanings according to editorial preference. It claims that “it’s transparent, so it’s acceptable” We say: Transparency does not justify intervention. We have written a complete refutation showing why this violates SO much the academic method as the principle of Arsa Prayoga. Share if you think textual integrity matters. Document in Spanish: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/whn0rnpj4zf6h87hojnd/refutacion_completa_concisa.pdf?rkeyb=41xegyv3069