The question that NADIE is answering well: How do we distinguish between: 1. the eternal principle that should always beined 2. the authorship detail, which can vary 3. the cultural interpolation that should always be removed Without a clear method for this, both sides are speculating. Hrdayananda Das Goswami appears to be using: - "If I don't like culturally = it is interpolation" - "If I like philosophically = it is a principle" Bhakti vikasa probably uses: - "If it is always done so = principle is removed" - "If it is new = suspicious" - "If they are smart = prabhami" Both methods are insufficient. 📌 THE PHILOSOPHY CONCLUSION OF Hrdayananda Das Goswami is not interpolation