← Back to archive
The question that NADIE is answering well: How do we distinguish between: 1. eternal principle (should always beined) 2. contextual application (can vary) 3. cultural interpolation (should be removed) Without a clear method for this, both sides are speculating. HD Goswami seems to use: - "If I don't like it culturally = interpolation" - "If I like it philosophically = principle" BVS probably uses: - "If it is always done so = principle" - "If it is new = suspicious" - "If it is dangerous" Both methods are insufficient. --- CONCLUSION PHILOSOPHICA OF HD Goswami: 1. Epistemological Loose: Confidencialism does not resolve how to avoid academically captology clearly 1. Method
← Go back Go to archive →